Candidate Scoring
Candidate Evaluation Scoring Report: TMGOC Full Stack Developer (.NET + Modern JavaScript + Azure)
Complete
Candidate scoring report is ready.
Scoring Preview
Candidate Evaluation Scoring Report: TMGOC Full Stack Developer (.NET + Modern JavaScript + Azure) India-based full-time contract Full Stack Developer role requiring 3-5 years of commercial experience, strong C#/.NET and ASP.NET Core Web API capability, modern JavaScript frontend experience, SQL, Azure App Services/Functions/Managed Identity exposure, testing, delivery ownership, and daily overlap with U.S. Pacific hours. Scoring Notes Submitted evaluation responses were treated as the primary evidence of practical depth and communication; resumes were used to corroborate and identify follow-up areas. Blank or template-only evaluations were scored conservatively even where the resume contains relevant claims. Scores are weighted across role-specific criteria and converted to an overall score out of 100. Scoring Parameters - Full-stack ownership and communication evidence (20): Evidence of recent ownership across backend, frontend, database, testing, release, production support, and ability to explain work clearly. - .NET/C# backend and API depth (22): Hands-on ASP.NET Core Web API, C#, REST design, dependency injection, async programming, validation, logging, authentication, and backend testing. - Modern JavaScript frontend capability (15): Production use of React, Angular, TypeScript, or similar frameworks with component design, forms, state, API integration, validation, and usability. - SQL and data-access competence (13): Relational schema work, SQL Server, stored procedures, EF Core or similar data access, indexing, query optimization, migrations, and performance diagnosis. - Azure, DevOps, deployment and operating model (12): Azure App Services, Azure Functions, Managed Identity or related services, Azure DevOps, CI/CD, configuration, monitoring, production support, remote India fit, and availability. - Design, testing, security and problem solving (18): Quality of short assignment/design thinking, authentication and authorization judgment, validation/error handling, test planning, defect diagnosis, AI-tool accountability, and security awareness. Candidate Ranking - Prasanthi Puli: 74/100 - Strong shortlist - Shreesha Shetty: 46/100 - Needs careful review - Mohd Sharique Qureshi: 45/100 - Needs careful review - Dinesh Kumar S: 43/100 - Needs careful review - Harigna Parth Talati: 42/100 - Needs careful review Prasanthi Puli Best evidenced submission because the evaluation is complete and aligns with the matched resume by name, email, phone, company, experience, and work history. Shows practical .NET full-stack exposure, React/TypeScript, SQL optimization, Azure App Service/Azure DevOps participation, and clear remote availability, though several answers are broad and need live validation. Full-stack ownership and communication evidence: 8/10 - Evaluation describes 3.9 years across API, React UI, SQL, testing, code reviews, deployment, and production support; resume corroborates recruitment/GovTech projects and full-stack work. .NET/C# backend and API depth: 7/10 - Covers ASP.NET Core Web API, CRUD endpoints, DI, async/await, validation, exception handling, JWT/RBAC, logging, Postman, and integration testing, but examples are not deeply specific. Modern JavaScript frontend capability: 7/10 - React.js, TypeScript, hooks, Axios, reusable components, validation, loading/error states, and dynamic workflow UI are supported by both evaluation and resume. SQL and data-access competence: 7/10 - Mentions SQL Server, stored procedures, views, joins, query optimization, indexing, and before/after verification; lacks detailed schema or EF Core implementation evidence. Azure, DevOps, deployment and operating model: 7/10 - Evaluation supports Azure App Services, Azure DevOps, configuration, deployments, Boards, production monitoring, immediate availability, and 7 PM-10 PM IST overlap; Azure Functions and Managed Identity are not evidenced. Design, testing, security and problem solving: 8/10 - Short assignment includes data model, REST contract, React component approach, validation, test cases, Azure deployment notes, JWT/RBAC explanation, production performance defect, and disclosed responsible AI-tool use. Strong points: - Only candidate with a completed evaluation containing end-to-end answers and availability confirmation. - Resume and evaluation consistently show .NET full-stack work with React/TypeScript, SQL Server, recruitment/GovTech exposure, Agile delivery, and Azure DevOps. - Responsible AI-tool use is disclosed and framed with review, modification, testing, and accountability. Weak points: - Several evaluation answers are polished and somewhat generic, with limited named implementation details, tradeoffs, metrics, or personal ownership boundaries. - Azure Functions and Managed Identity, both specifically requested in the SOW, are not evidenced beyond Azure App Service and Azure DevOps. - Testing evidence is present but thin; unit/integration testing details are not specific. Probe further: - Ask her to walk through the dynamic workflow management feature: API shape, React state design, validation, what she personally owned, and one production issue she fixed. - Have her design a small ASP.NET Core API live with JWT/RBAC, validation, error handling, SQL persistence, and one test. - Probe Azure depth specifically: App Service configuration, deployment pipeline steps, secret handling, logs, and whether she has used Azure Functions or Managed Identity hands-on. Shreesha Shetty Resume is relevant and fairly strong for .NET, Angular, REST APIs, SQL, Azure DevOps, xUnit, production support, and regulated healthcare work, but the submitted evaluation appears template-only with no candidate answers. Match is assumed from the SHREESHA evaluation filename and Shreesha Shetty resume. Full-stack ownership and communication evidence: 3/10 - Resume claims end-to-end ownership, mentoring, Agile collaboration, and production support, but the evaluation provides no practical written evidence. .NET/C# backend and API depth: 6/10 - Resume supports .NET Core, C#, RESTful Web APIs, Entity Framework, CQRS, Repository Pattern, OData, xUnit, and Moq; unsupported by evaluation examples. Modern JavaScript frontend capability: 5/10 - Resume lists Angular and React, with Angular used in clinical trial software and React in a trading project; no submitted feature explanation. SQL and data-access competence: 5/10 - Resume indicates SQL Server, MySQL, Entity Framework, LINQ, reporting, and performance work, but no evaluation evidence of database decisions or optimization. Azure, DevOps, deployment and operating model: 4/10 - Azure DevOps pipelines, Repos, Boards, CI/CD, Git, and production deployment are listed; Azure App Services, Functions, Managed Identity, remote overlap, and availability are not confirmed in the evaluation. Design, testing, security and problem solving: 4/10 - Resume mentions xUnit, Moq, code reviews, regulated clinical-trial compliance, RBAC, production issue resolution, and architecture discussions; no assignment, auth explanation, AI-use answer, or defect narrative was submitted. Strong points: - Resume shows strong alignment with .NET Core, C#, Angular, RESTful APIs, SQL Server, Entity Framework, xUnit/Moq, Azure DevOps, and production support. - Clinical trial software and 21 CFR Part 11 exposure may be useful where disciplined engineering and audit readiness matter. - Resume shows seniority signals such as mentoring, code/design reviews, stakeholder demos, and architecture discussions. Weak points: - Evaluation appears blank, so practical communication, ownership, assignment quality, availability, and AI-tool accountability are missing. - Azure App Services, Azure Functions, and Managed Identity are not clearly evidenced in the resume. - Experience is listed as 5+ years, above the SOW's 3-5 year target range. Probe further: - Confirm whether the blank evaluation was intentional or an upload issue; request the completed assignment before interview decisions if process consistency matters. - Ask her to walk through one clinical trial module end-to-end, including API, Angular UI, SQL, testing, release, and what she personally owned. - Probe hands-on Azure beyond Azure DevOps: hosting, configuration, monitoring, Functions, identity, and production troubleshooting. Mohd Sharique Qureshi Resume shows strong backend .NET/Core API, SQL Server, JWT/RBAC, Angular, Azure CI/CD, and FinOps scale, but he presents as a backend specialist and the submitted evaluation appears template-only with no answers. Match is assumed from the SHARIQUE evaluation filename and Mohd Sharique Qureshi resume. Full-stack ownership and communication evidence: 3/10 - Resume claims backend ownership and Agile collaboration, but role is described as backend-focused and no evaluation examples were submitted. .NET/C# backend and API depth: 7/10 - Resume strongly supports ASP.NET Core Web API, C#, EF Core, ADO.NET, microservices, async, profiling, JWT/RBAC, and 20,000+ user backend systems; no evaluation validation. Modern JavaScript frontend capability: 4/10 - Resume includes Angular 14/15, TypeScript, Razor, Bootstrap, and frontend collaboration, but candidate brands himself as backend specialist and provides no frontend feature response. SQL and data-access competence: 6/10 - Resume gives concrete SQL Server, stored procedure optimization, window functions, targeted indexing, and data-modeling signals; not supported by evaluation. Azure, DevOps, deployment and operating model: 4/10 - Resume lists Azure, Azure CI/CD pipelines, Docker, deployment on IIS and Azure; App Services, Functions, Managed Identity, availability, and Pacific overlap are not confirmed. Design, testing, security and problem solving: 3/10 - Security and performance claims are strong on resume, but no assignment, auth explanation, testing approach, defect write-up, or AI-tool answer was submitted. Strong points: - Resume indicates strong backend fit for ASP.NET Core Web API, C#, SQL Server, JWT authentication, RBAC, and performance optimization. - FinOps platform serving 20,000+ users is a useful scale signal if verified. - Angular and TypeScript exposure is present, including an Angular website and admin CMS integration. Weak points: - Evaluation appears blank, so practical written evidence and short assignment are missing. - Resume explicitly positions him as a backend specialist, while the role requires broad full-stack ownership. - Azure Functions, Managed Identity, testing specifics, remote overlap, and six-month availability are not evidenced. Probe further: - Confirm whether he is genuinely comfortable owning frontend work, not only collaborating with frontend teams. - Ask him to reproduce a small Angular + ASP.NET Core task feature live or walk through one he personally built. - Probe Azure App Service, Azure Functions, Managed Identity, CI/CD, and production deployment responsibilities in detail. Dinesh Kumar S Resume is technically relevant across .NET, Angular, SQL Server, Azure App Service, Azure Functions, Azure Storage, Logic Apps, Azure DevOps, and enterprise projects, but the submitted evaluation appears template-only with no answers. Match is assumed from the DINESH evaluation filename and Dinesh Kumar S resume. Full-stack ownership and communication evidence: 3/10 - Resume describes full SDLC, QA/product collaboration, mentoring, and end-to-end project work, but evaluation provides no practical examples. .NET/C# backend and API depth: 5/10 - Resume supports .NET 6/8, ASP.NET MVC, Web API, REST APIs, business logic, clean architecture, and Entity Framework; no written backend example was submitted. Modern JavaScript frontend capability: 5/10 - Resume shows Angular 11 and React JS skills, with Angular UI component work in a compliance platform; no candidate explanation of component/state/API work. SQL and data-access competence: 5/10 - Resume includes SQL Server, stored procedures, query tuning, reporting, and data access layers, but no evaluation database example. Azure, DevOps, deployment and operating model: 6/10 - Resume gives stronger Azure coverage than most template-only candidates: App Service, Storage Account, Functions, Logic Apps, Application Insights, Azure DevOps, build/release/configuration; availability not confirmed. Design, testing, security and problem solving: 3/10 - Resume mentions debugging, unit tests, TDD practices, pipeline improvements, and issue resolution; no assignment, auth approach, AI-use answer, or practical defect narrative. Strong points: - Resume has broad Azure service exposure directly relevant to the SOW, including App Service, Functions, Storage, Logic Apps, Application Insights, and Azure DevOps. - Long enterprise experience across .NET, Angular, SQL Server, deployment, QA coordination, and mentoring. - Compliance and global enterprise operations projects may translate well to structured product-team delivery. Weak points: - Evaluation appears blank, so role-specific practical evidence, availability, assignment quality, and communication are missing. - 12+ years of experience is far above the SOW's requested 3-5 year level and may imply seniority/cost/role-fit mismatch. - Resume has limited detail on authentication/authorization, modern React/TypeScript depth, and testing specifics. Probe further: - Clarify motivation and fit for a 3-5 year pod-member role under a senior full-stack lead. - Ask him to walk through the Independence CheckPoint project end-to-end, including his exact ownership of Angular, .NET API, SQL, Azure deployment, and testing. - Probe whether he can work the required U.S. Pacific overlap and full-time six-month engagement. Harigna Parth Talati Resume shows substantial .NET, Angular, SQL Server, healthcare, Web API, JWT, Azure DevOps, CI/CD, IIS, and client-facing experience, but the submitted evaluation appears mostly template-only and even omits parts of the assignment structure. Match is assumed from the Harigna evaluation filename and Harigna Talati resume. Full-stack ownership and communication evidence: 3/10 - Resume claims full-stack contributions across multiple healthcare projects, leadership, and client interaction; evaluation provides no substantive answers. .NET/C# backend and API depth: 5/10 - Resume supports .NET Core, ASP.NET Core 8, Web API, C#, Entity Framework, middleware, Repository Pattern, JWT, and SignalR; no backend example was submitted. Modern JavaScript frontend capability: 6/10 - Resume is strong for AngularJS and Angular v2-v20, Kendo UI, responsive UI, and healthcare components; no evaluation feature evidence. SQL and data-access competence: 4/10 - Resume lists SQL Server, stored procedures, functions, and reporting, but lacks detailed optimization or schema examples and has no evaluation support. Azure, DevOps, deployment and operating model: 3/10 - Resume lists Azure DevOps, CI/CD, IIS, and Azure OpenAI Service integration, but not Azure App Services, Azure Functions, Managed Identity, remote overlap, or availability. Design, testing, security and problem solving: 3/10 - Resume mentions JWT, architecture, analysis, and collaboration, but no assignment response, testing evidence, defect narrative, auth approach, or AI-tool accountability answer was submitted. Strong points: - Resume shows strong Angular and .NET full-stack healthcare experience, including modern Angular versions and ASP.NET Core 8. - JWT authentication, Web API, Entity Framework, Repository Pattern, Kendo UI, and SQL Server are relevant to the role. - Client interaction and leadership signals appear in the resume. Weak points: - Evaluation appears blank or incomplete, so practical depth and communication cannot be assessed from the assignment. - 9 years of experience is above the requested 3-5 year range and may indicate seniority mismatch. - Azure App Services, Azure Functions, Managed Identity, testing, remote overlap, and availability are not evidenced. Probe further: - Confirm whether the missing assignment content was an upload/submission issue. - Ask her to walk through one healthcare module using Angular + ASP.NET Core + SQL Server, including API contract, validation, authorization, and deployment. - Probe hands-on Azure services beyond Azure DevOps/IIS and confirm fit for a full-time six-month India-remote role with U.S. Pacific overlap.